Which one is worse: non stop eating or non stop smoking? -

Which one is worse: non stop eating or non stop smoking? -

u need to c a doctor@ Logicmarty

Actually, the stomach can fail if you were to attempt non-stop eating, hence why people throw up.
If you were to hold it in and continue eating, you can get ULCERS and eventually tear your stomach.
Smoking won-t be as quick to take effect, so you-ll get hurt from eating first.


Report Abuse


Non stop smoking would be worse because it does permanent damage to your body.

Adding to the answer below. if you non stop ate, you would still go to the toilet and poo it out and or throw it back up so therefore impossible for your stomach to burst, non stop smoking you can suffocate yourself before you put down your packet of 40s.The stomach is meant for food. Stuffing it just makes you fatter. IF you like becoming a big fat slob, then that-s your problem.
The lungs are meant for breathing, NOTHING ELSE. Those who use their lungs for something else are just not very bright (no matter how many college degrees they have or what their position is in society is.Well, since it-s non-stop, eating would be worse.
Because your stomach would burst before smoking would deal any damage.see where it brings you

Which one is worse: non stop eating or non stop smoking? -